<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>SHR # 1740 :: CASUAL FRIDAY ::</title>
		<description>Discuss SHR # 1740 :: CASUAL FRIDAY ::</description>
		<link>https://www.superhumanradio.net/shr-1740-casual-friday</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:15:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.superhumanradio.net/jcomments/rss/com_content/4714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Andrew Barker says:</title>
			<link>https://www.superhumanradio.net/shr-1740-casual-friday#comment-1384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[FORBES: "The annual list of the largest U.S. charities is a roster of the country’s biggest as calculated by Forbes. However, what is done with that largesse can be quite another matter. Biggest does not necessarily mean the best run. This is a quantitative list based on hard numbers, but over the years we’ve exiled a few charities for dodgy accounting. Numbers aren’t everything, but they can be a way of starting your evaluation of a specific charity, whether on or off this list." http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampbarrett/2014/12/10/how-to-evaluate-a-charity/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Andrew Barker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 15:24:55 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.superhumanradio.net/shr-1740-casual-friday#comment-1384</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
